Talk:Tanquam agnus (Tomás Luis de Victoria): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Unless I'm very much mistaken, the motet ought to be entitled <i>TaMquam agnus</i>. ~~~~") |
FatherCekada (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unless I'm very much mistaken, the motet ought to be entitled <i>TaMquam agnus</i>. [[User:Jkelecom|Jkelecom]] ([[User talk:Jkelecom|talk]]) 12:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC) | Unless I'm very much mistaken, the motet ought to be entitled <i>TaMquam agnus</i>. [[User:Jkelecom|Jkelecom]] ([[User talk:Jkelecom|talk]]) 12:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
I agree. I scratched my head over this when I posted it, because the "m" is the more common spelling. The Oxford Latin Dictionary, though, gives "tan-" as a variant. I guess if there were a Victoria equivalent of the BWV, we could go with that, but I'll agree to whatever the editors here decide. Thanks! [[User:FatherCekada|FatherCekada]] ([[User talk:FatherCekada|talk]]) 15:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 6 June 2017
Unless I'm very much mistaken, the motet ought to be entitled TaMquam agnus. Jkelecom (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I agree. I scratched my head over this when I posted it, because the "m" is the more common spelling. The Oxford Latin Dictionary, though, gives "tan-" as a variant. I guess if there were a Victoria equivalent of the BWV, we could go with that, but I'll agree to whatever the editors here decide. Thanks! FatherCekada (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)