Talk:Orlando di Lasso: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Richard Mix (talk | contribs) m (Richard Mix moved page Creating Talk:Orlando di Lasso to Talk:Orlando di Lasso: how strange!) |
Richard Mix (talk | contribs) (hm) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
0110 1562 ''Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci'' Rom Sec Mad 4 Publisher A. Barré. | 0110 1562 ''Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci'' Rom Sec Mad 4 Publisher A. Barré. | ||
I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC) | let alone to deal with [[User:Bcjohnston523/Draft Lassus page|No.s 1-94]]. I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:53, 28 August 2017
Reorganisation
User:Barry Johnston has drawn my attention to an interesting proposal in the CPDL Operation and Implementation issues forum which I mean to study.
My very first impression is that it would be a pity to have to re-invent a labeling system for publications; it's confusing to read:
0380 1570 Viginti quinque sacræ cantiones, 5vv Nur Sac Mot 5 Second enlarged edition of 1562a.
and find that 1562a
0120 1562 Sacrae cantiones quinque vocum Nur Sac Mot 5 Enlarged 2nd edition issued in 1570
has a higher number than 1562b
0110 1562 Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci Rom Sec Mad 4 Publisher A. Barré.
let alone to deal with No.s 1-94. I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. Richard Mix (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)