Talk:Orlando di Lasso: Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Richard Mix moved page Creating Talk:Orlando di Lasso to Talk:Orlando di Lasso: how strange!)
(hm)
Line 15: Line 15:
  0110 1562 ''Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci'' Rom Sec Mad 4 Publisher A. Barré.
  0110 1562 ''Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci'' Rom Sec Mad 4 Publisher A. Barré.


I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
let alone to deal with [[User:Bcjohnston523/Draft Lassus page|No.s 1-94]]. I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:53, 28 August 2017

Reorganisation

User:Barry Johnston has drawn my attention to an interesting proposal in the CPDL Operation and Implementation issues forum which I mean to study.

My very first impression is that it would be a pity to have to re-invent a labeling system for publications; it's confusing to read:

0380	1570	Viginti quinque sacræ cantiones, 5vv	Nur	Sac	Mot	5	Second enlarged edition of 1562a.

and find that 1562a

0120	1562	Sacrae cantiones quinque vocum	Nur	Sac	Mot	5	Enlarged 2nd edition issued in 1570

has a higher number than 1562b


0110	1562	Il terzo libro delle Muse a quattro voci	Rom	Sec	Mad	4	Publisher A. Barré.

let alone to deal with No.s 1-94. I have to admit though I haven't thought much about how NG chooses the letters in its YYYYl format. Richard Mix (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)