Talk:Michel-Richard de Lalande: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Canonical name: reply .... "Lalande" is better) |
(further agreement) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I agree, Carlos. I've always known this composer as "Lalande" [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]] [[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 00:06, 4 August 2011 (CDT) | : I agree, Carlos. I've always known this composer as "Lalande" [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]] [[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 00:06, 4 August 2011 (CDT) | ||
::I've no objections - "Michel-Richard de Lalande" seems to be a better-established title. [[User:Cydonia|Cydonia]] 15:03, 4 August 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:03, 4 August 2011
Canonical name
According to both the Grove Dictionary and the "Quellen-Lexikon", the preferred form is "Michel-Richard de Lalande". Anyone against renaming the page to this form? —Carlos 
23:27, 3 August 2011 (CDT)
- I agree, Carlos. I've always known this composer as "Lalande" Chucktalk Giffen♫ 00:06, 4 August 2011 (CDT)
- I've no objections - "Michel-Richard de Lalande" seems to be a better-established title. Cydonia 15:03, 4 August 2011 (CDT)