Talk:Justi in perpetuum vivent (John Sheppard): Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


Hi Barry.
Hi Barry.
This is a rare slip in the index. The editor may have been confusing the chant with the Sarum Rite antiphon "Justi autem in perpetuum".  Sheppard's piece, however, is a setting of the responsory, which was definitely just "Justi in perpetuum" (without the "autem"; I checked several sources to make sure).—
This is a rare slip in the index. The compiler may have been confusing the chant with the Sarum Rite antiphon "Justi autem in perpetuum".  Sheppard's piece, however, is a setting of the responsory, which was definitely just "Justi in perpetuum" (without the "autem"; I checked several sources to make sure).—
[[User:Jason Smart|Jason Smart]] ([[User talk:Jason Smart|talk]]) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
[[User:Jason Smart|Jason Smart]] ([[User talk:Jason Smart|talk]]) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:57, 7 July 2021

Title

In the index to The Baldwin Partbooks at Christ Church, no. 90 is Justi autem in perpetuum, and I don't see Justi in perpetuum vivent. Are these different or the same? — Barry Johnston (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Barry. This is a rare slip in the index. The compiler may have been confusing the chant with the Sarum Rite antiphon "Justi autem in perpetuum". Sheppard's piece, however, is a setting of the responsory, which was definitely just "Justi in perpetuum" (without the "autem"; I checked several sources to make sure).— Jason Smart (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)