Talk:Inviolata, integra et casta (Josquin des Prez): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times. | * In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times. | ||
* In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone. | * In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone. | ||
* In bar 51, Cantus, the semibreve should be E rather than F | |||
* In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this). | * In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this). | ||
* In bar 136, Tenor 1's first note again requires an editorial natural, I think. | * In bar 136, Tenor 1's first note again requires an editorial natural, I think. |
Revision as of 15:42, 30 March 2020
- 7927
Possible score errors:
- In the title, the second word should be 'integra', not 'intagra'.
- In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times.
- In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone.
- In bar 51, Cantus, the semibreve should be E rather than F
- In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this).
- In bar 136, Tenor 1's first note again requires an editorial natural, I think.
The underlay in several parts looks odd in several of the parts, missing in some places and some odd word placings.
Jamesgibb (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)