Talk:Inviolata, integra et casta (Josquin des Prez): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Possible score errors: - In the title, the second word should be 'integra', not 'intagra'. - In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;7927 | |||
- In the title, the second word should be 'integra', not 'intagra'. | - In the title, the second word should be 'integra', not 'intagra'. | ||
- In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times. | - In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times. | ||
- In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone. | - In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone. | ||
- In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this). | - In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this). | ||
- In bar 136, Tenor 1's first note again requires an editorial natural, I think. <br>[[user:Mick Swithinbank|Mick Swithinbank]] | |||
The underlay in several parts looks odd in several of the parts, missing in some places and some odd word placings.<br> | |||
[[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 09:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:06, 29 July 2013
- 7927
- In the title, the second word should be 'integra', not 'intagra'.
- In bar 9, Cantus, the descending scale should be maintained, so the G should be an E: this is a melodic line that is repeated a number of times.
- In bar 40, Tenor 1, an editorial B natural is desirable, to avoid the tritone.
- In bar 102, Tenor 1, the second note should be G rather than F (other sources confirm this).
- In bar 136, Tenor 1's first note again requires an editorial natural, I think.
Mick Swithinbank
The underlay in several parts looks odd in several of the parts, missing in some places and some odd word placings.
Jamesgibb (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)