Talk:Didier Lupi second: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
:::Thank you for all the excellent details you have provided! As there was a 'Tiers livre' published by Beringen in 1548, it seems likely that the 'Second livre' of 1568 is also a reprint of a 1548 publication. | :::Thank you for all the excellent details you have provided! As there was a 'Tiers livre' published by Beringen in 1548, it seems likely that the 'Second livre' of 1568 is also a reprint of a 1548 publication. | ||
:::Given M. Guillo's statement and the title of the 1559 edition of the 'Premier livre', I would be almost certain that Du Chemin's 1559 edition is not an original publication, and I would not list the 1548 and 1559 editions as separate publications on Lupi Second's composer page, implying equivalent originality. Perhaps the 1559 edition could be indented to show its status as a second edition. Furthermore, I would give the 1548 edition as the first publication on each work's page. Do you think that would be reckless? - [[User:GeoffG|GeoffG]] ([[User talk:GeoffG|talk]]) 05:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC) | :::Given M. Guillo's statement and the title of the 1559 edition of the 'Premier livre', I would be almost certain that Du Chemin's 1559 edition is not an original publication, and I would not list the 1548 and 1559 editions as separate publications on Lupi Second's composer page, implying equivalent originality. Perhaps the 1559 edition could be indented to show its status as a second edition. Furthermore, I would give the 1548 edition as the first publication on each work's page. Do you think that would be reckless? - [[User:GeoffG|GeoffG]] ([[User talk:GeoffG|talk]]) 05:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: Sounds like a plan! | |||
::- [[User:Stenand|Stenand]]([[User talk:Stenand|talk]])11:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC+3) |
Revision as of 08:20, 20 June 2022
Du Chemin, 1559
Is the 1559 edition of the Guéroult chansons different from the 1548 Beringen book, or is it just a reprint edition put out by Du Chemin, like the 1568 edition? I have always assumed it is a reprint as implied by the title, but I don't have easy access to the contents lists to compare them. - GeoffG (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- The 1559 edition seems to be identical to the 1568 in content. (NB. There seems to be a Second Livre also printed in 1568!) I have no idea how the 1559 and 1568 prints are in relation to the 1548 as I can't find any lists of contents for that one. Mentions in encyclopedias either states the 1559 and 1568 as reprints with minor differences to the 1548 or reprints with some more fundamental corrections. - Stenand(talk)07:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC+3)
- The contents of the 1559 print (both the original tavola and pieces numbered.)
- Asseurés vous. Fueillet fol 44
- A toy Seigneur fol 47
- Chantés a Dieu fol 3
- Comment par aduersité fol 15
- C'Est à toy seul fol 26
- C'est moy sans plus fol 36
- Contentement de chose corporelle fol 42
- Dames qui au plaisant son fol 22
- Douce memoire heuresse, & aggrea.fol 39
- L'altitonnant duquel en fol 33
- Làs í ay peché deuant ta face fol 53
- Or sus mon ame en ce bas ter fol 5
- O l'homme heureux fol 11
- O seigneur Dieu nous qui sommes fol 19
- O langoureux Esprits fol 28
- O Seigneur Dieu, puis que fol 49
- Puis qu'en toy gist perfection fol 51
- Qu'Israël die, & confesse fol 13
- Sus, sus, qu'on se dispose fol 8
- Susanne un iour d'Amour solicitée fol 24
- Verbe eternel par lequel toute choses fol 31
- No. 1 Chantés a Dieux chanson nouuelle PDF pag 4.
- No. 2 Or sus mon ame en ce bas territoire pag 8.
- No. 3 Sus, sus qu'on se dispose pag 14.
- No. 4 O L'homme heureux, qi a de Dieux la crainte pag 20
- No. 5 Qu'Israel die et confesse en effet pag 24.
- No. 6 Comment par aduersité pag 28.
- No. 7 O Seigneur nous qui sommes pag 36.
- No. 8 Dames qui au plaisant son pag 42.
- No. 9 Susane un iour d'amour solicitée pag 46.
- No. 10 C'Est à toy seul à qui dois recourir pag. 50
- No. 11 O Langoureux esprits, vivants et peine pag 54.
- No. 12 Verbe eternel, par lequel toute chouse pag 60.
- No. 13 L'Altitonant, duquel en ce bas estre pag 64.
- No. 14 C'Est moy sans plus, qui des humains esprits pag 70
- No. 15 Douce memoire heureuse et aggreable pag 76
- No. 16 contentement de chose corporelle pag 82.
- No. 17 Asseurés vous personnes bien heurées pag 86.
- No. 18 A toy, Seigneur, mon triste cueur aspire pag 92
- No. 19 A toy, Seigneur, dedie corps, et ame, pag 98
- No. 20 Puis qu'en toy gist perfection pag 102.
- No. 21 Las i'ay peché deuant ta face pag 106.
- - Stenand(talk)13:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC+3)
- Link to Catalogue page of The Second livre 1668 mentioned above: http://www.bvh.univ-tours.fr/Consult/index.asp?numfiche=1402
- as to the one on Premier livre 1668: http://www.bvh.univ-tours.fr/Consult/index.asp?numfiche=1401
- - Stenand(talk)13:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC+3)
- According to Laurent Guillo, in Les Éditions Musicales de la Renaissance Lyonnaise
- Paris 1991 (p.76-77), the 1548 and 1559 editions are identical apart from the text of one song:
- The song that in the 1548 edition begins "Contentez vous" begins "Assurés vous" in the 1559 edition.
- (It is not quite clear if Guillo's remarks concern both the music and the texts. At least the pieces
- and their order seems to be the same.)
- Thank you for all the excellent details you have provided! As there was a 'Tiers livre' published by Beringen in 1548, it seems likely that the 'Second livre' of 1568 is also a reprint of a 1548 publication.
- Given M. Guillo's statement and the title of the 1559 edition of the 'Premier livre', I would be almost certain that Du Chemin's 1559 edition is not an original publication, and I would not list the 1548 and 1559 editions as separate publications on Lupi Second's composer page, implying equivalent originality. Perhaps the 1559 edition could be indented to show its status as a second edition. Furthermore, I would give the 1548 edition as the first publication on each work's page. Do you think that would be reckless? - GeoffG (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)