Talk:Caro amoroso neo (Carlo Gesualdo): Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
m (italics)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I suggest we keep the first part and second part of these madrigals separate - it makes them easier to navigate, and when they are presented in the partbooks, they are notated separately.[[User:C.boveroux|C.boveroux]] ([[User talk:C.boveroux|talk]]) 05:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
I suggest we keep the first part and second part of these madrigals separate - it makes them easier to navigate, and when they are presented in the partbooks, they are notated separately.[[User:C.boveroux|C.boveroux]] ([[User talk:C.boveroux|talk]]) 05:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
:They are presented consecutively in the sources, yes, and performers can of course decide for themselves if the sections stand on their own. I don't understand exactly what makes them easier to navigate as two pages, though. They might be '''as''' easy, if [[Ma se tale ha costei (Carlo Gesualdo)|s
:They are presented consecutively in the sources, yes, and performers can of course decide for themselves if the sections stand on their own. I don't understand exactly what makes them easier to navigate as two pages, though. They might be '''as''' easy, if [[Ma se tale ha costei (Carlo Gesualdo)|
2nda parte '''Ma se tale ha costei''']] were added to the title (a bit of extra work, it seems to me) but real difficulties begin when someone makes an edition containing both halves: does it have to be posted twice to each of 2 pages, or do we need a 3rd page, [[Caro amoroso neo/Ma se tale ha costei (Carlo Gesualdo)]]? [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 01:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
(2nda parte: ''Ma se tale ha costei)'']] were added to the title (a bit of extra work, it seems to me) but real difficulties begin when someone makes an edition containing both halves: does it have to be posted twice to each of 2 pages, or do we need a 3rd page, [[Caro amoroso neo/Ma se tale ha costei (Carlo Gesualdo)]]? [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 01:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:53, 25 December 2013

I suggest we keep the first part and second part of these madrigals separate - it makes them easier to navigate, and when they are presented in the partbooks, they are notated separately.C.boveroux (talk) 05:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

They are presented consecutively in the sources, yes, and performers can of course decide for themselves if the sections stand on their own. I don't understand exactly what makes them easier to navigate as two pages, though. They might be as easy, if (2nda parte: Ma se tale ha costei) were added to the title (a bit of extra work, it seems to me) but real difficulties begin when someone makes an edition containing both halves: does it have to be posted twice to each of 2 pages, or do we need a 3rd page, Caro amoroso neo/Ma se tale ha costei (Carlo Gesualdo)? Richard Mix (talk) 01:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)