Difference between revisions of "Category talk:William Byrd compositions"

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Should Byrd's {{CiteCat|Music publications}} be in this category?)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
I'm not sure, but I lean towards having the {{CiteTemp|Composer}} template '''not''' applied to pages which are Music publications.  What do others think?
 
I'm not sure, but I lean towards having the {{CiteTemp|Composer}} template '''not''' applied to pages which are Music publications.  What do others think?
 
}}
 
}}
 +
:That would make sense to me, Chuck. We want compositions listed in such categories, not publications edited/compiled/published by the composer or other collections associated with the composer. --[[User:Bobnotts|Bobnotts]] <small>[[User talk:Bobnotts|'''talk''']]</small> 17:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 21 November 2008

Should Byrd's Music publications be in this category?

 Help 

This category lists 285 items, of which 279 are actually composition pages for Byrd. There seem to be 6 items from Music publications included by virtue of having {{Composer|William Byrd}} affixed ("Cantiones, quae ab argumento..." is excluded since there is no Composer template there):

I'm not sure, but I lean towards having the Composer template not applied to pages which are Music publications. What do others think?

That would make sense to me, Chuck. We want compositions listed in such categories, not publications edited/compiled/published by the composer or other collections associated with the composer. --Bobnotts talk 17:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)