Difference between revisions of "Category talk:New works in the past 30 days"

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
::::It's Ok Carlos, don't change, it's not worth the risk. [[User:Claude T|Claude]] ([[User talk:Claude T|talk]]) 16:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::::It's Ok Carlos, don't change, it's not worth the risk. [[User:Claude T|Claude]] ([[User talk:Claude T|talk]]) 16:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
: I think some are confusing "New works" (ie. works that have not appeared before at CPDL) with "New editions" &ndash; something for which the NewWork template simply adds to the confusion. &ndash; [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]]&nbsp;[[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 16:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:48, 30 January 2015

No, Carlos, Es ist ein Ros entsprungen is NOT a new work. Just one of its 24 editions is recent ;-) Claude (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

LOL! Old habits are hard to change :) This is a subcategory of New works, I had to follow the long-established nomenclature. —Carlos Email.gif 17:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Great! Let's change now the name of the category and the title of the list on main page, no? (I'm aware that 3 works among 4 have only one edition). Claude (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Where, exactly, on the Main page? The list title "Most recent scores" looks fine! As for the category "New works", it's used inside of a bunch of DPL queries; if renamed, it should be done carefully. Is it worth the work? —Carlos Email.gif 12:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
It's Ok Carlos, don't change, it's not worth the risk. Claude (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
I think some are confusing "New works" (ie. works that have not appeared before at CPDL) with "New editions" – something for which the NewWork template simply adds to the confusion. – Chucktalk Giffen 16:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)