Category talk:New works in the past 30 days: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::It's Ok Carlos, don't change, it's not worth the risk. [[User:Claude T|Claude]] ([[User talk:Claude T|talk]]) 16:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::It's Ok Carlos, don't change, it's not worth the risk. [[User:Claude T|Claude]] ([[User talk:Claude T|talk]]) 16:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
: I think some are confusing "New works" (ie. works that have not appeared before at CPDL) with "New editions" – something for which the NewWork template simply adds to the confusion. – [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]] [[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 16:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:48, 30 January 2015
No, Carlos, Es ist ein Ros entsprungen is NOT a new work. Just one of its 24 editions is recent ;-) Claude (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- LOL! Old habits are hard to change :) This is a subcategory of New works, I had to follow the long-established nomenclature. —Carlos 17:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Where, exactly, on the Main page? The list title "Most recent scores" looks fine! As for the category "New works", it's used inside of a bunch of DPL queries; if renamed, it should be done carefully. Is it worth the work? —Carlos 12:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)